Posted in Psychology

Barnum Effect: “Something For Everyone”

For this week’s blog post I will talk about the Barnum Effect, its cognitive effects and biases.

“At times you are extroverted, affable, sociable, while at other times you are introverted, wary, and reserved”. If this sentence describes you then you fall victim to the Barnum effect, as does most the population.

The Barnum effect or as it can be known as the Forer effect is a cognitive effect that is seen in media and social living. The oxford university press defines the Barnum effect as “The tendency to accept certain information as true, such as character assessments or horoscopes, even when the information is so vague as to be worthless”.

This cognitive hoax was created by P.T Barnum who was a 19th century circus showman who coined the term “A sucker born every minute”. This effect although created in the 1800’s still is used in current life as it is used in horoscopes, fortunes, and psychics, mind readers, personality tests and other popular forms of predicting ones’ personality.

The cognition behind the Barnum effect has to do with a few cognitive aspects. One reason for the effectiveness of the Barnum effect has to do with memory specifically one’s internal memory storage, where we tend to have a larger memory about ourselves compared to others and so when given a vague statement, we implicitly scan our long-term memory to find behavioral reasoning to apply to the statement making it appear true.

Another plausible reason for the internal acceptance of vague statements is based on the source of information. People are more likely to believe given information if it comes from a reliable source or a source that has previous experience at being accurate.

This for example can be applied to an experimenter with a professional demeanor, or someone who believes in superstition, good luck, or fortune can believe the statements from a psychic, mind-reader, a newspaper horoscope or a Facebook personality test. The idea behind this theory is motivation or the history or reliability of the source of information. This is more steadily applied when the information is deemed more positive than negative, this I believe is based on the idea that as humans we are optimistic about ourselves, and our future. This is represented by a couple of cognitive biases such as Social desirability bias, which is a tendency to answer questions with answers that would be deemed as favourable to receive praise or the personal validation effect where you internally validate the individual or source of information which then your acceptance of the statement increase. This is seen in the Milgram experiment and Rosenhan experiment where it showed the power of the authority.

Some researchers think that higher acceptance of bogus statements is due to human gullibility, or that we have a biological need as humans to be sociably acceptable to others, and will intrinsically agree with vague statements that tend to be false.

Other cognitive effects or biases that that coincide with the Barnum effect are the self-serving bias which is a belief in more positive traits and statements than in negative ones, which can either inhibit or increase the Barnum effect.  There is also the confirmation bias where people pay less attention to information that doesn’t’t pertain to them, this is in relation to the notion that we agree with more positive information about ourselves, and so we unconsciously pay less attention to negativity especially about one’s self.

Other cognitive biases that can be represented alongside the Barnum effect is the Placebo effect believing something will work like a medication, which creates an actual effect because of the belief, not the supplement.

For this week’s photograph, I have posted a photo that I believe is a metaphor for the Barnum effect, that when you first look at the photo it appears to be a gorgeous mural, but when you look past image you seen that the mural is just covering up an old brick wall in a run down area. This is similar to the Barnum effect where once you look past the face and go deeper into the actual context, you find something different.

References:

http://psychology.iresearchnet.com/social-psychology/social-cognition/barnum-effect/

Allum, N. (2010). What makes some people think astrology is scientific? Science Communication, 33(3), 341–366. doi:10.1177/1075547010389819

David, T. (2014). Top Twelve most agreed with statements magic words. Retrieved from http://www.magicwordsbook.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Top-Twelve-Most-Agreed-With-Statements-Magic-Words.pdf

Marks, D. F. (1988). The psychology of paranormal beliefs. Experiential, 44(4), 332–337. doi:10.1007/bf01961272

Oxford University Press. (2017). Barnum Effect. Retrieved January 21, 2017, from Oxford Dictionary, https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/barnum_effect

Rudowicz, E., & Hui, A. (1997). The creative personality: Hong Kong perspective. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, 12(1), 139–157.

Snook, B., Cullen, R. M., Bennell, C., Taylor, P. J., & Gendreau, P. (2008). The criminal profiling illusion: What’s behind the smoke and mirrors? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35(10), 1257–1276. doi:10.1177/0093854808321528

Wikipedia (2016a). Social desirability bias. In Wikipedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_desirability_bias

Wikipedia (2016b). Subjective validation. In Wikipedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subjective_validation

Wikipedia (2017). Barnum effect. In Wikipedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barnum_effect

Posted in Uncategorized

Creativity: A Psychological Perspective

“Creativity is defined as the tendency to generate or recognize ideas, alternatives, or possibilities that may be useful in solving problems, communicating with others, and entertaining ourselves and others.”

This quote by Robert E. Franken is an adequate way of defining creativity and its purpose, which is one of the areas that I plan to touch on in this first blog entry.

Creativity by most people is described as a trait that allows you have creative flow to be artistic, inventive but is considered a trait that only some people have that ability to be creative. Those who possess a creativity trait are more innovative, dynamic, and bold, while at the same time is considered by other as being less logical and only enable intelligence toward creative tasks. In actuality, Psychology believes it is a behavior or a type of thinking or skill that everyone possess. Creative thinking allows an individual to solve problems, perform pattern recognition, increase learning, and memory in non-uniformed ways. Creativity allows a individual to be adaptive, flexible, and possess leadership qualities, but is a process nonetheless; just like any other skill or behavior, it must be maintained through practiced.

Based on the data and articles I researched, which some of them I have posted the references below,  I wonder why there can be such disconnect between art and science, and art and intelligence in society. Especially when the data and facts claim that creativity is just a different way of thinking that uses multiple brain areas without logical interfering, and that works for many people.

I hope that in further blog posts I can examine this conundrum and the cognitive skills used while being creative.

This lead to a question that readers can provide additional insight into: Do you believe that creativity is a trait or a process/ skill of behavior?

References

Sharp, C. (2004). Developing young children’s creativity: what can we learn from research? National foundation of educational research 1–11.

Smith, S. (1997). Fixation, Incubation, and Insight in Memory and Creative Thinking. In The Creative Cognition Approach (second Edition ed.) (pp. 135–156). MIT: Bradford. Citations, Quotes & Annotations

Rudowicz, E., & Hui, A. (1997). The creative personality: Hong Kong perspective. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY12(1), 139–157.(Rudowicz & Hui, 1997)